<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for e-ignite</title>
	<link>http://www.e-ignite.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>Security and Privacy related stories - what's in the news just now?</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 13:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Phone scammers, useless helplines and friendly enemies by Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.e-ignite.co.uk/blog/archives/54#comment-42656</link>
		<author>Adam</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 17:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.e-ignite.co.uk/blog/archives/54#comment-42656</guid>
		<description>Hi Rolo48,

Yes, they seem to have removed my details as I've not had any problems with them since.  I've also not noticed any increase in spam SMS messages I've been receiving either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rolo48,</p>
<p>Yes, they seem to have removed my details as I&#8217;ve not had any problems with them since.  I&#8217;ve also not noticed any increase in spam SMS messages I&#8217;ve been receiving either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Phone scammers, useless helplines and friendly enemies by Rolo48</title>
		<link>http://www.e-ignite.co.uk/blog/archives/54#comment-42641</link>
		<author>Rolo48</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.e-ignite.co.uk/blog/archives/54#comment-42641</guid>
		<description>Adam, did they remove you details from their database as these companies have a bad habit of selling customer lists to other scammers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam, did they remove you details from their database as these companies have a bad habit of selling customer lists to other scammers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Don’t believe everything you hear on the news… by Blaster</title>
		<link>http://www.e-ignite.co.uk/blog/archives/84#comment-38812</link>
		<author>Blaster</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 06:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.e-ignite.co.uk/blog/archives/84#comment-38812</guid>
		<description>Thats really good if you ask me. I believe it 100%. In our English class we talk about this kind of stuff. Misleading media. It really is a big problem and people really need to use their brains and think about what they are really saying here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats really good if you ask me. I believe it 100%. In our English class we talk about this kind of stuff. Misleading media. It really is a big problem and people really need to use their brains and think about what they are really saying here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Comments on this blog by Jacobs</title>
		<link>http://www.e-ignite.co.uk/blog/archives/23#comment-6968</link>
		<author>Jacobs</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 11:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.e-ignite.co.uk/blog/archives/23#comment-6968</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For info.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070523-researchers-307-digit-key-crack-endangers-1024-bit-rsa.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Arstechnica Article: 307-digit key crack endangers 1024-bit RSA&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jacobs&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>For info.</p>
<p><a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070523-researchers-307-digit-key-crack-endangers-1024-bit-rsa.html" rel="nofollow">Arstechnica Article: 307-digit key crack endangers 1024-bit RSA</a></p>
<p>Jacobs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The figures are out: 439,000 UK phone taps in a year! by Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.e-ignite.co.uk/blog/archives/70#comment-6790</link>
		<author>Duncan</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 21:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.e-ignite.co.uk/blog/archives/70#comment-6790</guid>
		<description>The undisclosed numbers are more than the disclosed ones I figure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The undisclosed numbers are more than the disclosed ones I figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Email privacy extended in the US by Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.e-ignite.co.uk/blog/archives/78#comment-5494</link>
		<author>Adam</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 23:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.e-ignite.co.uk/blog/archives/78#comment-5494</guid>
		<description>I'm afraid that I don't know specifically where this ruling would be applied - realistically, I think it's still a fairly grey area.  Consider the following:

Perhaps it applies only to the servers located in the US.  The email of some American citizens may be stored outwith the US, meaning that their email privacy is not protected at all.

Perhaps it applies to US Companies - as you know, Gmail is owned by Google (an American company), and this may imply that &lt;i&gt;all&lt;/i&gt; email kept on servers owned by Google are protected by this court ruling.

Alternatively, it may only apply to emails sent or accessed from IP addresses originating in the US.  Consider that in this case, a user accesses their email from a holiday destination outwith the USA.  Does this therefore mean that the emails they access are not protected by the ruling, but emails they don't access are?

Unfortunately, with international boundaries becoming less important, these questions may not be easily answered and I unfortunately don't have a definitive answer for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m afraid that I don&#8217;t know specifically where this ruling would be applied - realistically, I think it&#8217;s still a fairly grey area.  Consider the following:</p>
<p>Perhaps it applies only to the servers located in the US.  The email of some American citizens may be stored outwith the US, meaning that their email privacy is not protected at all.</p>
<p>Perhaps it applies to US Companies - as you know, Gmail is owned by Google (an American company), and this may imply that <i>all</i> email kept on servers owned by Google are protected by this court ruling.</p>
<p>Alternatively, it may only apply to emails sent or accessed from IP addresses originating in the US.  Consider that in this case, a user accesses their email from a holiday destination outwith the USA.  Does this therefore mean that the emails they access are not protected by the ruling, but emails they don&#8217;t access are?</p>
<p>Unfortunately, with international boundaries becoming less important, these questions may not be easily answered and I unfortunately don&#8217;t have a definitive answer for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Email privacy extended in the US by Veerasundar</title>
		<link>http://www.e-ignite.co.uk/blog/archives/78#comment-5476</link>
		<author>Veerasundar</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.e-ignite.co.uk/blog/archives/78#comment-5476</guid>
		<description>is this applies to the emails stored in the gmail servers outside the US?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is this applies to the emails stored in the gmail servers outside the US?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Email privacy extended in the US by I Pollitici &#187; USA, le email sono protette dalla Costituzione, come la posta ordinaria</title>
		<link>http://www.e-ignite.co.uk/blog/archives/78#comment-5192</link>
		<author>I Pollitici &#187; USA, le email sono protette dalla Costituzione, come la posta ordinaria</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 10:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.e-ignite.co.uk/blog/archives/78#comment-5192</guid>
		<description>[...] tutto il mondo. I servizi come Gmail, Hotmail e Yahoo Mail hanno infatti i loro server oltreoceano: ora saranno protetti dal quarto [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] tutto il mondo. I servizi come Gmail, Hotmail e Yahoo Mail hanno infatti i loro server oltreoceano: ora saranno protetti dal quarto [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Email privacy extended in the US by 100iso.it &#187; Blog Archive &#187; USA, le email sono protette dalla Costituzione</title>
		<link>http://www.e-ignite.co.uk/blog/archives/78#comment-5086</link>
		<author>100iso.it &#187; Blog Archive &#187; USA, le email sono protette dalla Costituzione</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.e-ignite.co.uk/blog/archives/78#comment-5086</guid>
		<description>[...] tutto il mondo. I servizi come Gmail, Hotmail e Yahoo Mail hanno infatti i loro server oltreoceano: ora saranno protetti dal quarto [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] tutto il mondo. I servizi come Gmail, Hotmail e Yahoo Mail hanno infatti i loro server oltreoceano: ora saranno protetti dal quarto [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iTunes DRM free tracks - is it really a privacy issue? by sumit</title>
		<link>http://www.e-ignite.co.uk/blog/archives/76#comment-4480</link>
		<author>sumit</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.e-ignite.co.uk/blog/archives/76#comment-4480</guid>
		<description>I don't know why but iTunes doesn't work on my PC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know why but iTunes doesn&#8217;t work on my PC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
